FOURthewin
Friday, March 21, 2014
Group Project: The Applications of Nanotechnology
Link to original post on Issuu.com
As nanotechnology continues to develop, numerous fields have integrated the advancements that it has produced into their own innovations, resulting in unique, "small-but-terrible" solutions for significant problems. In line with this, this project takes a look at how nanotechnology plays a role in three critical fields- - namely, electronics, the environment, and medicine.
FOUR the Win
De Guzman, De Luna, Dungca, Evangelista, Fabula,
Galunan, Garcia, Lejano, Perea, Rillo
Thursday, March 20, 2014
The Mind Museum
It was
interesting to see the different experiments that can be conducted at home
using only household products which you use every day. In my opinion, it would
be very effective if science was taught in a lively and enjoyable manner like what
we experienced during the lecture where activities were done by the speakers
which included the participation of the students.
It
will give the chance for students to learn science from a different perspective
other than only through a series of lectures. It will also give the chance for
the students to participate more or be more interested in the lectures.
I
haven’t been able to go to the Mind Museum, but based on the
background/information given by the speakers, I think that it would become a
wonderful experience for children/students to go there because of the
activities which they do and the inventions they showcase.
I
am intrigued by the classes they conduct which allow anyone who is interested
to join such as summer science camps where you can learn how to investigate and
the like. When I get the chance to, I would love to visit the Mind Museum so I
can explore what else they offer myself.
The Bride of Frankenstein
Since “The Bride of Frankenstein”
is a film from 1935, the quality of the movie isn’t as good as compared to the
movies in the present time. The supposedly “horror” film came out as a comedy
film to some of us students because of how “Frankenstein” or the monster acted
such as smoking a cigar, drinking a beer, and being all friendly or
“lovey-dovey” with the blind man who befriended him.
One of the
lessons I’ve learned from the film is how science and technology can be used in
a dangerous way by using it to tamper with life and death. There is a reason
why the dead remains dead and what was shown was that the effect of
resurrecting the dead can make what used to be a human into a monster.
Although the
movie showed that “Frankenstein” can be friendly or become a good monster when
approached in a calm and nice manner, what people seem to fail to notice is
that it’s also possible that one of the effects of this experiment is creating
something which cannot be controlled or even harm the human civilization.
Science and what
it can do both amazes and scares me since I have seen in the film, even though
it is fiction, that it has no boundaries. Also, the ability of people,
scientists, inventors, etc. to continue on experimenting and inventing things
beyond their grasp will never stop as long they have curiosity in their minds
and can wait as long as it takes to prove their theories or achieve their
goals.
Imelda Romualdez
When the Marcoses were in power,
I was still inexistent, my mother was only 10 years old and my grandfather
worked in a government people see as both progressive and corrupt. I’ve only
heard stories during their time and have a lot of questions as to which side to
believe in. Based on the documentary we watched, a side of the Marcoses were
shown through Imelda Marcos.
Imelda
Romualdez Marcos is a woman who appreciates beauty whether it is the physical
or inner aspect of beauty. Even in the “ternos” that were custom-made for
Imelda, each design was unique and carefully embroidered to suit her taste.
It was seen in
the documentary how much Imelda appreciated the culture of the Philippines and
saw how little attention Filipinos are giving to cultural arts. I was able to
see how much priority she gave to the construction of cultural and health
institutions for the need of the public, although there were still some issues
as to how much sacrifices were made for the completion of each.
In
my opinion, Imelda was a remarkable person in her own way. She appreciated the
beauty of our culture and how important it was for our culture to grow and be
noticed more by our fellow Filipinos and even foreigners. So maybe she was a
little (or too much?) narcissistic, but aren’t we also like that sometimes?
Reaction Paper on Imelda
Imelda Marcos is a mythical figure. The Filipino consciousness
has blown her up to herculean proportions, as Ferdinand has also been. The
documentary Imelda, which the lady
herself has tried to censor, provides a straightforward account on the character
and history of Imelda as both the myth and the reality.
Her youth was not short of spectacular as her later years
were. She was acquainted with some of the most preeminent historical figures, including
Douglas MacArthur. She was the epitome of beauty, grace, and talent. The people
who surrounded her were no less convinced that she was, in fact, perfect.
More so were her life as Mrs. Marcos, when she graced
Ferdinand’s presidential campaign and led him to win by landslide. There was no
doubt that she was used as a mechanism for the win, but she was immediately paid in power, ruling beside (and not behind)
her husband.
Everything she’s done in the Marcos Regime – from the
manifestation of her so-called edifice complex to controlling the birth rate –
had a massive impact, even after they had fled to exile. Imelda saw life from
the point of view of beauty, and even her perception of Martial Law was such.
When asked before what the biggest contribution of Martial
Law was, Imelda answered that it was the ‘restoration of democracy,’ sincerely and
charismatically, as if she believes it. This is what surprised me most: Imelda
saw history differently, she absolved her family of any guilt, and chose to
blur out the not-beauty, when the whole world saw a dictatorship and the
destruction of democracy.
All in all, Imelda
painted a picture of the Steel Butterfly with all her beauty and crooked edges,
realistically bringing to life the myth that is Imelda Marcos to the mortal
comprehension.
Christine Joy L. Galunan
Christine Joy L. Galunan
2013-50860
Reaction Paper on Mind Museum Lecture
If you ask children what their favourite subject is, most
would answer science. However, as they enter primary school towards high school,
there seems to be a decline in their interest, particularly because science
instruction has transformed from magic to
concepts and theories to memorize.
This is what the Mind Museum is trying to revive – science as
magic. I was genuinely surprised when the speakers revealed that they were
actual science practitioners and not merely runners of kiddie shows because we grown-ups basically believe that science
is locked up in labs, exclusive only to those who can, if not locked away in textbooks.
When they showed us a few experiments, after such a long
time, the science-curious child in me came out, anticipating the magic, and there
it was as we all watched wide-eyed. That attempt to bring science down from its
ivory tower was successful without undermining the actual understanding and
appreciation that near-adults could get.
This is actually a manifestation of the larger problem that
disciplines are in, most especially science. It is almost automatic that once
higher education comes into the picture, science becomes less accessible, less
stimulating, less comprehensible not because it is but the current educational
system frames it so. I do admire those who opt to study the natural sciences for
further study, but as long as it does not foster a more resonant call for
younger students to take consistent interest, the future of science is
uncertain.
Christine Joy L. Galunan
2013-50860
Reaction Paper on the Time Travel Documentary
To what reason do we owe
man’s struggle to master time?
Being an ardent follower of several science fiction essentials
related to time travel (i.e. Doctor Who, 12 Monkeys, HG Wells’ The Time
Machine, etc.), the details in the documentary were not of general surprise.
Fiction has already transcended the facts of time travel’s physical
possibility; that we are continually amazed by the hard science and continue to
speculate the what if of controlling
past, present, and future.
What was surprising, though, was the interest with which
these physicists explained and convinced their audience, as if it assumed that
we were already hooked in the first place – and we were. Time travel is as
attractive to man as is the thought of immortality. The fact that it is one of
the most commonly used science fiction tropes only confirms man’s obsession
with this phenomenon.
Is our attachment to life tantamount to our attachment to
time? As humans, most certainly, we are bound to our mortality as we are to the
normalcy of the ticking second. Our lives are governed by time as we are by the
prospect of death; we are all going to die someday, as we are supposed to wake
up at a certain time the next day.
Both are proofs of our limited humanity, and time actually
bears the heavier scale because the course of our lives (towards death) is
linear, defined by time. Our being death-bound is dependent on our being
time-bound.
What does time travel have to do with all this? Like most
developments in science and technology, time travel is an attempt to tip over
the scales of humanity, to overcome these limits that keeps man chained to the
laws of nature regarding his life and how he travels through it. Additionally,
if time travel were possible, man would overcome the struggle of not knowing certain things like the
backdoors of history or what he is bound to be in the future. He can even save
himself from a certain direction of fate if only he knows where he’s heading;
he can live a life that spans a million years with just one visit to the past,
and another to the future. He can immortalize himself, leaving a mark all
through the universe, that man the
unlimited has done what he thought he cannot.
But one of the reasons why we still continue to struggle
for it is not because we cannot, but because the laws of nature themselves are
restraining humans from exploiting the most organic forces of the universe.
Order will be disrupted as every change causes ripples through the time-space
continuum, and knowing this, we ask ourselves: were we really meant to control
time, or is this the universe’s way of controlling us and reminding us that
after all, we still are humans?
Christine Joy L. Galunan
2013-50860
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)